Joint Tortfeasors

Example

“When both the drunk driver and the city (for poor road maintenance) were found to be joint tortfeasors in the accident, the injured plaintiff could collect the full $100,000 judgment from either party.”

Memory Tip

Think 'Joint TORT-feasors' as 'jointly making a tort (wrong)' - like two people jointly lifting something heavy, they're jointly responsible for any damage if they drop it.

Why It Matters

This legal concept affects insurance claims and coverage significantly, as it allows injured parties to collect full damages from any responsible party with adequate insurance, even if that party was only partially at fault. It protects victims while ensuring they can recover compensation even if one tortfeasor lacks resources.

Common Misconception

Many people think each joint tortfeasor only pays their proportional share of damages, but under joint and several liability, each can be held responsible for the entire judgment. This means a party who is only 20% at fault might still have to pay 100% of damages if other tortfeasors can't pay.

In Practice

In a three-car accident, Driver A (60% fault), Driver B (30% fault), and Driver C (10% fault) are joint tortfeasors causing $150,000 in damages to an injured pedestrian. Driver A has no insurance and no assets, Driver B has minimal coverage, but Driver C has a $500,000 policy. The pedestrian can collect the full $150,000 from Driver C's insurance, even though Driver C was least at fault.

Etymology

From Old French 'tort' (wrong) and 'feasor' (doer), literally meaning 'wrongdoers,' with 'joint' added to indicate shared legal responsibility. The legal concept developed in English common law during the medieval period.

Common Misspellings

Related Terms

More in insurance

Other insurance terms you should know

See Also